SHARIF KHAN BROTHERS versus CHIEF CONTROLLER, IMPORTS AND EXPORTS
R (C) Constitution of Pakistan (3 1973ts), Arts, citizens, & citizens and Constitution 199 citizens Constitutional application Practicing discretion by governmental officials to the governmental authorities in the present case is fair, fair, reasonable and reasonable. On the one hand, the applicant was given a rickshaw import order which led to the submission of import license fee and on the other hand, he changed his policy and canceled the order and the applicants. Was also refused a refund of the accumulated import license fee. The stance taken by the stand was counter-intuitive, unfair, unfair, unreasonable and against common sense, against militancy and exploitation against fundamental rights and constitutional guarantees as included in Art3embe. 4 (1973) Even if there was no application in this case of the license and permit fee order 1979 KR7 (c), the imports license fee collected was unconstitutional, inappropriate, non-exclusive. Was unfair, unfair and exploitative especially when other people were told in similar circumstances that Article 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan This has been made clear in the case of Farazi (1973). Applicant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Quaidabad lawyer