Find a Lawyer

RYAS versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302 / Pro 34 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 9 Section8), Section 6464 ? All the prosecution's testimony was based on the defendant's confessional statements, there was no administrative misconduct in recording the defendant's confessional statements. Was. The methods and procedures for recording confessional statements were accepted by the magistrate, but such confessional statements were withdrawn by the accused in the recording of the confessional statements by four days, the prosecution complainant, who resigned from the FIR. Was given, it should not have been understood. Adversity and cross-examination were announced, but confessional statements have not been conferred with the FIRF itself and it has not been shown anywhere that the victim and the accused, who are in a mutual relationship, There was a past enmity between which the prosecution relied. Without a doubt, the accused was acquitted of the charges against them property advocates from Sialkot lawyer