ALLAH BAKHSH versus SYED KARAM SHAH
The Special Relief Act, 1877, was not sufficient to prove a contract in favor of the claimants for proof in Section 42 Transfer of Property Act (I82 of I82), Section 54 suit records, and if any such agreement was proved, there was no No title or title will be created. In accordance with the provisions of Section 445 of the Transfer Property Act, in favor of the plaintiff's unregistered document, the defendant's title was exercised by the registered sales deed in favor of which both the courts misrepresented the wrong decision. Had arrived. The non-reliance of evidence on the record and the reliance on unreliable and unreliable evidence remained unacceptable because the seller was silent about the sale price or details of the sale or advertised ideas against the seller. Details of Defendant's Non-Position He was also in the wrong place The facts on record established this case for declaration on T he was unable to maintain the basis of the contract of sale and the specific performance of the contract. Only one case could be filed for which the judgment passed by the courts The High Court had set aside the orders.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Madinah lawyer