Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus MUHAMMAD YAQOOB

The trial court found the accused to be underage, pursuant to a determination of Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 7 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 439, before the complainant. Applying for a proper order regarding the medical examination of the accused, the Juvenile Court sent the accused to the school's headmaster instead of conducting a medical examination of the accused, who gave birth to the accused's birth. Generated original registration registers. At the same time, her school leaving certificate was found in the original register of the Juvenile Court, records indicate that the accused was the commissioner and the complainant's request for medical examination of the accused was generally valid for age. Or an authentic school record was proof of age. Unlike medical proof, as a medical proof was almost in nature, the age of a child was again at the time of admission to the school where the relevant school registers were banned when no further crime was considered. There was no medical evidence about the age at which such a child might be involved in the coming period, according to a medical partner. Estimated conditions, but also external considerations, can be obtained or whenever there is a dispute between the medical evidence and the proof of age at school enrollment, the proof of age listed in the school register is preserved. Priority will be given as default. Complainant was rightly dismissed because he was unable to file a High Court interference in review jobs for advocates from New Saeedabad lawyer