RAHIM BAKHSH versus STATE
The provision of the accused's name was not mentioned in the Criminal Code (CR PC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Guarantee, FIR and no suspicion was made against it. Because of the blood stains, there was no identifiable value of the statements of the witnesses that the accused had previously allegedly excused, the extra-judicial confession showed that the accused was offered money and he was A pardon was also promised, such extra-judicial confession could not be declared voluntary, the statement of the prosecution said, before the confession, Yushan was discussing the terms and conditions with the witnesses, the past history of the accused's involvement in the crime could not be made the basis of his conviction in the trial, further allegations against the accused are needed. Gone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Rajanpur lawyer
