BASHIR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 540 and 439 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/379/396 were presented by the prosecution to the witnesses, the trial court summoned as court witnesses as the trial court On the same day, the court accepted the witnesses without giving any notice to the other party, and without giving any party an opportunity to present arguments in this regard, the trial court had no reason to accept that. Was not recorded. The plea of the trial court had acted as an improper way of accepting the plea submitted by the accused under section 404040; the judicial order of the PC itself should be a spelling order which the court may pass in order to give its proper verdict. I had applied my mind to the solutions involved. In this case, the trial court's jurisdiction was neither appropriate nor the regular impeachment order was set aside and after the mat tire had given the parties the opportunity to resolve their arguments, the decision of the accused's plea was made. A remand was obtained in the trial court after which its review application was approved.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer