MUHAMMAD INAAM versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) / 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 103 Occurred on a deep, cold and stormy night No light was available on the spot No FIR was filed at that time. It is mentioned and the complainant and the Investigation Officer stated that the two witnesses, who were crucial to the prosecution's case, were discharged because of any untoward incident due to unnecessary events. Was not substantiated by and did not imply trust. Three motives of the prosecution proved that the accused was not charged with special custody of the accused and that he was also against the provisions of section 103. The evidence of the PC's recovery was inconsistent when eyewitnesses were detected at the scene. Incredible, medical evidence lost all its supporting role Prosecutor's evidence was unbelievable to retain the culprit Capital charges were rocket charged He survived the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Chilas lawyer