Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

WAZIRAN DETHO versus THE STATE


Section 9 (c) of the Drug Control Act 1997 defines the evidence that both the 11 accused women were found to have recovered 11/2kg of opium and 12 1/2kg of marijuana which they could not recover. In a police search, the provisions of section 103, CRPC were not applicable in the case, prosecution witnesses were charged that there was no enmity on the basis of the false allegations against the accused. The chemical expert could not be produced in court for non-production of journal entries in which the police party left the police station to conduct raids, which was the only function which had no effect against the prosecution in connection with the perpetrators of drug addiction. Was. And the culprits of the accused were retained

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Matli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.