Find a Lawyer

MAQBOOL AHMAD KHAN versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY THROUGH CHAIRMAN

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) mandatory retirement on account of misconduct, negligence, misconduct and misappropriation of a public servant shows that the accused public servant was provided with appropriate opportunity of hearing but he had no To no avail The case is known for the reasons it is known that a civil servant withdrew a substantial amount of money without justifying any justification and misused it on various occasions and failed to prove that he had put in question. The money was spent through a proper channel, and for government purposes, once it was proved that the public servant put the burden of the money on it to prove where and where it was spent, he was able to bear the burden. Failure to make, no inquiry officer, authorized officer or authorized authority and no serious misconduct by anyone. Investigation of the relevant records reveals that the proposed procedure was followed and that a fair C employee was laughed at to show how the money was spent. jobs for fresh advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer