Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED

Section 12 (3) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) Section 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the Supreme Court of Appeal approved for consideration, whether the employees' oral suspension section 12 (3) or not (West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment) Ordinance, 1968, which clearly provided that the services of a laborer were written only for a clear written reason. The decree can be terminated by the order and was organized by both the Labor Court and the Labor Appellate Tribunal. The court did not participate in such an aspect of the case. Although section 1 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, there was no such classification as daily wages, which included different classes and types of employees: whether employees / applicants. According to the meaning of the West Pakistan Industrial Workers and Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968, and Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 and such employees, the rights guaranteed under the provisions of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance. In the Labor Court. , 1968, and whether the employees had treated the Special Authority / Member, the National Industrial Relations Commission, and thus a reasonable reason for the delay in section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, to waste time in these proceedings. Was. In this case, the Labor Appellate Tribunal has apologized for the delay in the discharge, giving the High Court such discretion to reject the decision to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction in the constitutional petition. power of attorney advocate Talagang lawyer