Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALIQ NAZ versus NE$PAK

Pakistan Panel Code Article 212 (3) The Supreme Court approved the request for verification of the termination of employment of public servants by the addition of Section 2 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, to examine these points. that. If the services of public servants were terminated for violating the principle of becoming a surplus, come first for the last time. Whether the civil servants were discriminated against because some of the people who joined them later were retained in the service despite the fact that the department wants to reduce the power of its workers. It was decided by the Federal Service Tribunal that one of the conditions contained in his appointment letter, which was obligated to pay three months' notice or pay for his services, was not suspended. Because in the case of a public servant to a junior officer, there are similar conditions which were allowed to remain in the job. Even though they did not enforce the legal rules, public servants were not entitled to any relief from the service tribunal because their relationship with the employer operated under the concept of employer and employer. And that, in view of Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act 1973, civil servants were not entitled to relief or rehabilitation in service and at best they could claim compensation from the Department because their services were, under the concept of Services Master. Walked and the servant advocate for immigration from Sargodha lawyer