M. IQBAL versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), SS6, 9, 16 and 51 Drug Act (XXI of 1976), Section 2 (G) Bull Phenobarbital Powder Accused Was a psychological substance recovered from it and thus an initial action was taken against it under section 6 of the Narcotic Materials Sub-Control Act 1997, with respect to the quantity of the material recovered, under section 9 (c) of the Act Was punished under. Against the approval of the bail, the bar in section 51 of the same Act was brought to the charge that it was alleged that phenobarbital powder had no license to buy or retain phenobarbital powder in such large quantities, No doubt, this definition was also included under section 2 (g) of the Drugs Act 1976 for drug purposes also, but this would not bring the case of the accused to the exclusionary jurisdiction. As provided under Section 6. The accused were denied bail in the Control of the Narcotic Sub Maintenance Act, 1997
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer