The FIR was lodged by the Pakistan Panel Code Section 302/34 3/2 hour late and did not prove the motive against the prosecution accused at the time mentioned in the FIR, but after the body was taken to the hospital in the dark hours of the night. Was dispatched after a long delay. Delays in sending the victim's body had raised serious doubts over the prosecution's story, and he has tried to show that the incident was unwarranted. The presence of eyewitnesses on the spot, even after a post-mortem report by the police and consultation with the complainant, could not be ascertained in the circumstances that a witness of the prosecution was closely related to the victim. , He lied. The firearm expert's report about the suspect's report did not link the co-accused to the rifle's import and rifle recovery commission. The suspects were convicted because a rifle recovered from the crime branch and allegedly recovered was disclosed as an absent witness to the incident and the parties were outraged. That way, the accused could not be falsely accused. Specifically, when no independent witness was presented by the prosecution, he was sentenced by the trial and trial court, giving the accused the benefit of the doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
