TAHIR ASLAM KHAN versus MERAJ DIN
CPC Adjustment of Civil Procedure Code Order XVII A XVII, R 3 Failure to Prove Evidence XVII, R 3, CPC did not provide conclusively that if there was no evidence in the history, then penalty against the party. The matter will be decided through, but it was said that when the law was not present when the evidence was not available then the court was present. Moving the Trial to Trial, the trial-related trial was not only illegal but it was also of legal authority and was under the control of the appellate court, especially when it was filed with the plaintiff. There was also no point of error. Look at such a harsh sentence and that too is not in accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from South Wazirstan lawyer
