Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD DIN versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302/34 34 The sudden provocative version of the application and evidence of the evidence was that the incident took place outside the house of the accused and the accused was taken to his house. The case presented to the accused was more understandable and reliable when compared to the complainant's version, there was no sign of being dragged from the place where the victim was killed according to the prosecution and the body was then found by the accused in his The prosecutor's story was that there was blood between the two locations that the incident took place outside the accused's house and then his body His body was taken in such a manner that his body was forged. The body of the accused was recovered from the house of the accused. Even the blood stained ground was taken from the said place. At that time, his sister was lied to and she appealed to the victim to be killed in a sudden outburst because both witnesses, who were the real father and brother of the victim, were not present on the spot. On the spot, they may have tried to save the deceased and then prevent the suspect from moving the body outside the home, the nature and the number of casualties on the victim, also showed that the incident took place under the tomb. Had come and the accused of sudden provocation was acquitted of the serious and sudden aggravated murder charge, the conviction which had already passed was considered sufficient to fulfill the pursuit of justice. ask a advocate free from Muridkay lawyer