Find a Lawyer

MUNIR AHMAD versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/148/149 The evidence was appreciated in the dark of night The prosecution failed to produce any evidence that there was any lightning or other light to show that it was impossible. During the time when the accused were firing indiscriminately, the accused had fired indiscriminately, so in the dark hours, the complainant and the witnesses were found innocent in the witnesses 2/3 investigation, the accused had no motive. Ocular evidence regarding the timing of the killing of persons and the time of injury to the prosecution witnesses: We do not cross-examine the medical evidence and the prosecution's witnesses, and it has been admitted by the doctor that this incident Did not accept the incident. In the manner and when the prosecution mentioned the recovery of firearms on the indictment of the accused, the fake case was of two versions, one was presented by the accused and the other by the prosecution version which had supported the Investigation Officer and the medical evidence. Has been shown to be more respectable and closer than the truth. The prosecution's story, which appeared to be unreasonable and irrefutable evidence, should have come from an unforgivable source of capital punishment, which was lacking in this case because the prosecution's story was full of suspicion and The accused was able to produce a sketch in the prosecution. The story was, doubtless, exploited by material contradictions between the ocular account and the medical evidence, not as a favor to the accused, but as a matter of conviction and sentencing for the accused by the trial court. Be from property advocates from Khewra lawyer