GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MANPOWER DIVISION, MINISTRY OF LABOUR versus ADAMJEE INSURANCE CO. LTD.
In the Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R 2, the plaintiff for the recovery of the plaintiff's claim for CPC Plant O VII claimed that the defendant / original contractor's actions in rejecting the construction project and resulting in the re-award of the contract. The other contractor, the plaintiff was harmed; during cross-examination of the plaintiff, the witness was not able to disclose that when the contract was abandoned by the original contractor, there was no copy of the contract between the claimant and the subsequent contractor. Was. It was not recorded how much money was agreed between the claimant and the resulting contractor, no specific documents were kept on the record to indicate that the project was subsequently successful by the contractor. Completed with, resulting in overpayment. More and more than the contract amount with the original contractor
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Usta Mohammad lawyer