Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NIM versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 342, 364 (2) and 537 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Impact given by the accused for not signing the accused's examination and not writing the court's own certificate The statements were not signed by them in Section 2 34 Cr, CRPC and submitted a certificate that the accused was examined in his presence and hearing, not written to the presiding officer of the court. Section 6464 ((?)), which was a clear violation of CRPC, stated that illegal treatment under 537 was not a cure, the PC charge against the accused was defective and the minor was guilty at the time of the offense. The present defendants were not prosecuted under the Juvenile Act, under which the trial court was ordered to resume. Strictly record the statements of the accused in accordance with the provisions of law under Section 342, CR PC.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Shemier lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.