Find a Lawyer

SOAZ ALI versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 324, 337F (iii) and 34 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), sections 161, 164 and 265J were appreciated in the counter-court case filed by the accused against the other party in which the injured. Was nominated. Since the main accused who injured the accused's father and other witnesses of the accused also played a very important role in the present case, the prosecution witnesses played their role during the incident, in which they They played a very important role, it was very clear that they were hiding from the material facts of the court and for this reason they could not be called honest witnesses and their evidence could not be accepted. A close relationship between the complainant and the prosecution witnesses with the injured was entered and the evidence was lacking in this case. Prosecutors claimed that the other villagers were assembled at the scene of the shooting, but had no recovered from it, had kept the incident and did not recover the gun allegedly used by the accused. Nor was there any counsel for the recovery of witness statements under Section 161, the CCP was recorded 7 days later and stated that the delayed violation of Section 265J, the unambiguous interpretation of the CR. The PC was presented in the case due to a notice when the statements of witnesses under section 164 under were not presented to the accused before the recording, CRPC Self Defense record can be traced and record According to the medical certificate, the material available at the site has only one casualty. Four accused were charged with armed robbery best advocate from Leepa lawyer