GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
By complimenting the evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b), the complainant had merely presented the eyewitness testimony of the incident which admitted that he was the brother of the deceased and that the victim had been identified by the party too late and The complainant did not say anything about it. The rifle was recovered from the suspects approximately six months after the incident and twelve days after its arrest, under the fact that it was not tested under section 2342. Yes, the CRPC did not do any good to the prosecution. The suspects were acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Rawat lawyer
