Find a Lawyer

MOULA BUX versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Articles 265 J & 367 Definition of evidence No independent witness was affiliated with the police even though the location of the incident was in the Ganjanabad area and the prosecution itself. According to many people when the incident occurred, people were attracted to the location of the incident. One of the prosecution's witnesses did not support the prosecution's case, however, it was the prosecution's claim that it was said that the witness was present with the complainant, and that other witnesses of the prosecution did not support the prosecution. The case, the prosecution was cutting the root of the case and the presence of the complainant and other prosecution witnesses at the site of the incident, it was suspected that advertising could be intervened against the prosecutor and the benefit of the doubt went to the accused witnesses. Did not The facts and their evidence before the trial court were not affecting the trust. No one can count on their evidence to be prosecuted when the complainant's case was well presented, the ocular testimony presented by the complainant. Should be viewed with suspicion, and such evidence cannot be relied upon to identify a live cartridge and four empty cartridges with a gun recovered. The accused was impacted by a delay of 14 days and said no recovery delay was specified; guns, a live cartridge and four empty cartridges that were not recovered from the scene of the incident were not sent to a ballistic expert for examination. And report the statements. The prosecution's witnesses were not registered in accordance with the mandatory provisions of Section 265J, the PC Trial Court slip jobs for fresh advocates from Akhora Khattak lawyer