The Pakistan Penal Code Section 168 evidence was not appreciated by the prosecution on the basis of any concrete material on record to prove that the accused, the director of a company serving the UDC in the T&T department Was also involved in personal employment. The presence of a defendant's attendance register in the T&T department documents of a company acting as a director was not significant, which was brought on record by the prosecutor, in his statement, 342, under CR Was not placed in front of the accused. The PC also cannot be considered because he was accused of defending a pertinent piece of evidence against him for his false interference in the case and went away illegally. Not even the proper authorities were allowed to prosecute the accused. Conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
