Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR versus STATE


Appreciation of Pakistan Penal Code Sections 365 and 412 Evidence Cage Sen. The complainant or prosecution witnesses of the conviction had no enmity with the accused accused, that he was involved in the case which had enmity with him, for some reason. Did not appeal. The complainant and the prosecution witnesses did not falsely accuse the accused; in the absence of enmity between the parties, the witness's testimony was difficult to refute, the prosecutor succeeded in establishing a case against the accused. Detachment equipment was recovered; PPC was retained from Dera on the conviction of the accused's co-accused under section 365 & 412, but since the accused had no criminal history, the court had relaxed While watching, reduce the sentence accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from Head Marala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.