Find a Lawyer

IMAMDINE versus PATHAN

The appreciation of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) / 34 evidence, the increase in the presence of the complainant, was proved at the scene of the incident when the FIR containing the details of the incident was filed immediately in the court premises. It happened. A large number of public officials and members of the public who were involved in the investigation supported the prosecution's case at that time, and as was claimed by the prosecution, the ocular testimony was quite clear, clear, trustworthy. And it was credible that the evidence of Franz Science Laboratory's medical evidence related to the pistol being recovered from the accused and the eviction of the crime was also fully supported, in the prosecution's case the defendant's sentence was upheld. However, there was hardly a ground for a lesser sentence that would not matter, which is equivalent to repealing or reducing the provisions of section 34 or 149, the PPC law specifying each injury by witnesses to a particular accused. Was not required when the accused's involvement and involvement in the commission of the massacre was established, he was to be honored. The minor, executed by law, was convicted by the accused on the portals of justice in which the law was fully insulted. Courts and civil society suspects were already planned when the accused was present under the court. Was attacked. The choice of justice and the manner in which the crime was committed showed the accused guilty of his heart. The accused did not deserve any relaxation in the case of conviction; the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment during the trial. Accordingly, death increased online advocate from Akhora Khattak lawyer