MUHAMMAD ASLAM, A.S versus D.I.-G. POLICE, FAISALABAD RANGE,FAISALABAD
Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Section 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Annual Secret Report Advent Entry Promotion His negative entries in the Annual Secret Reports of 1975, 1979, 1980 and 1982 were never removed. ? And it had the most serious remarks. A civil servant was also punished for censoring and forfeiting service for several years. The department had refused to promote a public servant and their appeal before the Tribunal Tribunal was superior to that of a public servant. Annual confidential information was not conveyed to them, therefore, at the appropriate time the matter was not aggravated that the validity was promulgated on the basis of low fitness and that the certified record holder of the pharma promotion grant rules. People were not allowed. The service claiming to be a right where a government employee had not previously raised the application said the E-Service Tribunal said it did not have negative comments, such as not claiming a promotion as a government employee of the Supreme Court. Could not be enraged before and there was a refusal or issue to be promoted in the exclusive discretionary domain of the executive authorities. In this case, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the service tribunal's finding and accordingly the leave to appeal was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from More kunda lawyer