Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ALI versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

In response to the question of the cancellation of underground land, Government Colonization Act 1912 Section 30 (2) of the Government Land (Punjab) was allotted for the permanent settlement of the previous offer of Islamabad which was allotted in the interest of the defendants. And the contract was registered in their favor. The appellant guaranteed allotment on the ground that the guru had already been allotted under the Guru Moor Food Scheme which the Board of Revenue canceled the allotment under the provisions of section 30 (2) of the colonization of public lands. Had done. In the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction (Punjab) Act, 1912, the High Court rejected the order of the Board of Revenue and the allotment was reinstated in favor of the respondents; the record of accuracy did not show that the appellant was ever underground. Was not allocated. The appellant was unnecessarily dragged on by the High Court-approved litigation in the Food Scheme. The accepted principle and there was no irregular or illegal act that required the intervention of the Supreme Court. top civil advocates from Kahror Pacca lawyer