SHAMIM HAIDER KAZMI versus PRESIDING OFFICER
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 185 The Supreme Court jurisdictional interference with the finding of facts appealed to the Supreme Court only if the finding of special jurisdiction tribunals was insufficient evidence, misrepresentation of evidence, non-consideration of material evidence, misconception of facts, Based on patent errors. Due to misuse of law or jurisdiction, it may also be interfered with by the Supreme Court. Article 185 (3) inquiries sought by the courts after dismissing the industrial dispute by order of the Supreme Court. Employment was made before the Labor Court, but without success the Labor Court did not find the Labor Appellate Tribunal's finding of legal status invalid and unacceptable by the Labor Appellate Tribunal and the High Court. The High Court's decision was free from any legal flaws and did not demand the intervention of the Supreme Court. I did. The court appeals were denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Jaranwala lawyer