Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus THE STATE

Appeal against the bad litigation under Section 245 (1) and 417 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), sections 427/452 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, was filed by the complainant against the first defendant. Filed and then filed an FIR against it. The defendant (the accused) and other persons after seeking the direction of the High Court in the constitutional petition, after the cancellation of the police FIR, after the police complainant canceled the FIR only against the respondent (the accused). Complainant's tendency to show that there was no nexus between the facts stated in his earlier FIR by the appellant / complainant while changing his version from one to the other and direct complaint was the alleged incident. The incident took place in the Ganjanabad area, but despite many people, no independent witnesses were examined from the area. People gathered at the scene of the witnesses Appellant / Complainant inspected were employees who could not be considered Appellant's absence from independent, independent witnesses against their owner presented a unanimous view Whether the defendant (s) was a liar, the appellant / complainant admitted in cross-examination that he was not present at the time of the incident. His entire case was dismissed. The trial court had rightfully acquitted list of advocates from Shedani sharif lawyer