Find a Lawyer

TARIQ SOHAIL versus DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY

Article 17 (h) (i) Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 20 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), and XUIX, RR 1 and 2 Interim Order, grant of error in performing the contract prima facie case and The defense officer housing authority issued a notice to the plaintiff regarding the resumption of additional leasehold land leased to the original monopoly in 1964, the plaintiff believed that the competent authority was equipped with measuring facilities and so on. The delivery scale was defensive. The Housing Society, which confirmed that the underground land lease was stated to be accurate where the plaintiff had faithfully accepted the measure, could not be held responsible even if it was discovered that it was The land was granted under a misconception and, in fact, it was a mistake to conclude that the termination of the contract or the maintenance of the provisions of section 20 of the Land Restoration Treaty Act, 1872 did not apply. ch Case Defense Housing Authority's permission to resume the alleged additional land would be equivalent to entering into the property that the plaintiff had and purchased for the price the plaintiff had, in good faith, if the plaintiff's case was good. The waiver was not granted, irreparable injury and damage to the plaintiff The balance of ease was also in favor of the plaintiff that the High Court prevented the plaintiff from following the notice issued and interrupting or interrupting the peaceful occupation of the plaintiff. , Or resumed or canceled the above mentioned land. Suit lease / syllabus pending closure lawer from fb area from Balakot lawyer