Find a Lawyer

MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 324, 337A (i), 337F (i), (iii), (v) and (vi) / 34 Counter-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), in addition to the definition of section 7 evidence. No evidence was available against the accused on record Only two prosecution witnesses identified the accused in the identification parade, while the other three witnesses did not appear in the aforementioned parade record, which did not indicate that the witnesses identified the accused. Had no opportunity to see before the magistrate could testify, to testify to the fact that in his presence, the identity of the accused by the witnesses was independent of any external error, But he could not guarantee that the witnesses had nothing to identify. The chance to see the accused at any time before the parade and they were not tutored The identity test was just a diversified piece of evidence, but there was no evidence available on the record that led to the confrontation, not the identification test. Another evidence on its own proved that recovery of the crime from the scene or medical evidence could indicate the existence of the incident, but the prosecution's help in acquiring the accused's conviction based on the evidence of the evidence. Could not The absence of animosity between the lonely accused and the witnesses could not confirm the truth of their statements. Such evidence could not be made on the basis of the accused's conviction safely and the accused was suspected in the circumstances. He was acquitted. law websites from Kohistan lawyer