Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR ALI SOOMRO versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497 and 196 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 123A / 124A / 324/353/147/148/149 Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act (1975) XV), Sections 4, 5 and 10 of the Bell Trial Court correctly found that S. 196, CR was not attracted to confessing crimes under the PCC Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975 But, despite the seriousness of the allegations, the trial matter needed to be considered. Depending on the whole situation as well as the entire background and then deciding whether the accused is entitled to bail, the record does not show that if a person was chanting slogans against the accused under any law. The assembly of was an illegal assembly. At the bailout stage, the state had to temporarily decide whether anyone protesting against water scarcity would be liable for the irresponsible move by a few people. n Citizens' independence and respect for the state and integrity, its sovereignty and law and order care since the trial court did not examine the merits of this case, the bail matters were remanded to the trial court for remand. Was. On the merits of the High Court observations list of supreme court advocates from Laliah lawyer