The eyewitnesses were not only interested witnesses, but also dishonest witnesses, including those who complained about the value of evidence, section 342, 537 and 364 (2) of the Pakistan Penal Code section 302/114. The complainant had made a statement in court. According to her statement in the FIR, the purpose of the incident was not established by the prosecution. The ocular testimony was fraudulent and was not endorsed by any independent evidence; the statement of the defendants listed under section 342 did not meet the CCP's legal requirements and was illegal. Not curable under section 373737, as a clear violation of the mandatory provisions of CCPC section 646464 (2), CCPC weapons were not recovered from criminal, the witness's account suffered natural flaws. And the proof of one defect cannot be identified by another defect. In this case, the investigating officer conducted a dishonest investigation in which the accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
