Find a Lawyer

ALTAF QURESHI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Sindh Civil Servants (Regulating Ad hoc Appointments) Act 1989 Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199, 2A, 18 and 25 Constitutional Appeal Regulatory Ad hoc Appointment, who was appointed Assistant Director at the Admitt High Court for six months. The basis for, but stated that, six months later was extended for two years, there were no recruitment rules in force at the time of the appointment of a public servant but appointment under the notification, method, qualification and other conditions during the service of the public servant. The deadline for which a public servant holds the minimum educational qualification for a post held Blyt was appointed as the second division, was appointed MA lack certain qualifications to the official notification when the notification was issued under this notification is also highly applicable. In the case of a civil servant, he cannot legally claim exemption from the principles of PR, for example, at the time of his initial appointment on the basis of ad hoc it was stated that the Sindh Civil Servants (Regulating Ad hoc Appointments) Act. , A special committee formed under 1994, issued illegal recommendations for a limited purpose. After the ad hoc appointment of a public servant and even more time was allowed to obtain the required qualification, the committee had no jurisdiction to do so, because the ad hoc appointment options were primarily given under a stop gap arrangement. Under which the appointment to the post was fixed under postponement. In such cases, the process of repeated extension of ad hoc appointment could not be approved. famous lower court advocate from Rawalpindi lawyer