Find a Lawyer

PUNHOON LASHARI versus THE STATE

In a further statement on the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) section 497, the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 337A (II) and 148 bail, the reason for the anonymity of the accused in the FIR The complainant was immediately registered after the FIR was properly defined. The witnesses were fully involved in the statements in their statements, the case of the co-accused who was granted bail was related to the accused complainant's case, and all the other witnesses of the prosecution fully identified one of their co-accused. I was sorry. The affidavits were sworn before the trial court and the two other accomplices were charged with provocation only, the grounds for consistency were not available to the accused, in the circumstances there was no possibility of mistaken identity of the accused as the parties. There were caste parties, with a common purpose and object, entered the house of the complainant during the strange hours of the night, killing two innocent persons and injuring the complainant C. Attention that no clear action was taken on the accused was not legally enforceable, in the circumstances the complainant along with the deceased person was argued with the help of medical evidence. , Being present, the accused was not entitled to bail best advocate from Chashma lawyer