Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 365B, 496A, 494 and 34 of abduction, coercing a woman into abduction or forcing a marriage, etc. To attach or detain a woman with criminal intent. The complainant also alleges that I was acquitted or detained, during which time the remarriage of the spouse, joint intent to guarantee, two more versions of further inquiry, and to marry the co-accused. Her sister / alleged kidnapper was already married. At the time of her alleged abduction, the complainant was immediately informed of the alleged crime, but she told police three Report filed after a day's unreasonable delay. , Which indicated that the alleged abductor had filed his statement with the magistrate under section 164, CCPC, after recording, negotiating and consulting. In which he explicitly denied the allegations in the FIR and said that because he was being sued, he left his own home and willingly married the accused. Contracted. That she had never been in a marriage with a co-accused before, and that the alleged kidnapper was sued in Family Court before she accused her family of seeking marriage. Was filed, the current case claiming to be her husband was of two versions, one was filed by the complainant in the FIR and the other was presented by the alleged abductor, different version of the alleged abductor further inquiry. That was enough to bail the accused on bail. The alleged kidnapper or co-accused never sued to become the husband of the alleged kidnapper.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
