Proof of intoxication of Section 9 (C) Police discovering evidence of the presence of a ban in a vehicle. Police searched a truck at a police barracks and recovered 45kg of heroin from secret cavities specially manufactured in the truck. ? Through a co-accused, when the accused was sitting in the front seat, the trial court convicted and sentenced the offender under Control Section 9 (c) of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997. The validity suspect was not driving the truck nor did he have any evidence. The effect was that he was either the owner of the truck or his cleaner complainant / police officer said in his investigation that the accused did not disclose the fact of hiding in secret caves but was a co-accused, who The truck was driving. And he had control and conscious information about the presence of the prohibition in the secret caves, and no evidence was revealed to show that the accused partner was a co-accused or knew of a ban on the truck, In such cases it can only be said that the accused had no criminal background in the truck, no appeal was allowed, the trial was punished and sentenced. The court was set aside and he was acquitted of the charge. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
