ATTA MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 (XLV of 1860), Sections 467, 468, 420, 217 and 409/34 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Bail, against the accused. The grant of the allegations was that he committed a serious crime and that he had done great harm to the government with the prosecution of the other accused and nowhere did he allege that the accused had played any particular role in which he was involved. What has benefited him in this matter will be determined. After hearing the evidence and cross-examination allegations of the prosecution witnesses by the trial court, sections 409, 467 and 468 came up against the accused. I was. In the unlikely event, there is evidence that there will be some tampering with the evidence. The fact that the money allegedly confiscated by the accused was large, there was no basis for denying bail against this action. After further investigation, the accused was released on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Daska lawyer
