MUHAMMAD JUMAN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 497 (XLV of 1860), Sections 397, 357, 148 and 149 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Ordinance) (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) Guarantees, Names The consent of the accused appeared in the FIR and the accompanying accused had robbed the complainant's house and deprived him of gold jewelery worth Rs. 2,38,000. Placed in No.2, the accused claimed that he was entitled to exemption in bail and that the police report was bound by the signature of the court as each matter had its own specific circumstances and was bound. About uayt I can not be any hard and fast rule. The court's police opinion came with a specific character, and there was enough evidence to prove that he was not entitled to a bail waiver for the accused involved in the most serious crime.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer
