Find a Lawyer

SAGHIR AHMED ANSARI versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION

The fatal accident suit for recovering the fatal accident act 1855 section 1 compensation plaintiff claims that his wife was 49 years old due to negligence, lack of care and default of defendant in performing his duties in respect. Was passed away from. The electrical wire that was broken due to a physical defect caused his wife's death. The defendants did not deny the death due to lightning, but defendants denied their negligence in allowing the wires to be ill-fitting and physically flawed. Despite the dangers of sustaining the pole wire, he was accused of neglecting the burden even though he was the first defendant, but where the defendants were charged with care and the circumstances in which the injury was reported. This was the type of care required, with no risk resulting from the routine of the events which the defendants bear. The witnesses produced by the plaintiff had unequivocally stated that the direct lightning wire fell on the victim. Defendants failed to present evidence of their negligence due to their negligence. There is no negligence in maintaining the wires which caused the death of the late. Negligence and defendants were found not to be taken care of, and they were responsible for paying compensation to the plaintiff, damaging the age, earning capacity, the remaining economic benefits of the anticipated life and other matters. law websites from Naukot lawyer