SADIQ HUSSAIN SHAH versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF
The Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court (Code of Conduct) 1984 R44 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), revision of the High Court restoration against the Section 115 Appeal Court decision was dismissed on the ground that there was no certified copy with the revision petition. Was. Applicant has not filed an affidavit after one and half year, certified copy of the order which was required to be filed within ninety days under R4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court, 1984. Nor has any given reason been submitted to the High Court for a delayed reason for failing to file the required copy of the appellate court's order with the revision memorandum, or the petitioner's behalf. It is a plea raised by the Supreme Court that he or she was a lawyer. In the event of any wrongdoing, misleading circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Jehlum lawyer
