Sections 44 and 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, the Civil Service Appointment Appointment Order under which direct response was made by the respondent was stated in its written statement to the writ petition authority that the respondent's appointment order. Was withdrawn by notification and that service was told by the respondent that the notification was not challenged by the respondent, after which the certification was submitted by the authority. The notification petitioner had in his writ petition prayed that the notification should not be declared invalid, no action was taken to cancel the notification, except the fact that a summary action was taken by the authority in which it was sent. Applicant could be badly affected; the writ of prohibition should not have been issued by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
