SARFRAZ TALIB versus ABDUL WAHEED
In the section 340 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC), 162 and 439 of the Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 140, under the previous statement in the cross-examination, presented under section 340 (2), The CRPC, as its own witness, defended its statement on the oath and at that stage it was a witness who Syed accused had given his first version at the time of arrest by the police and his He later deviated from the first version and involved the applicant in the case. In those cases, the cross-examination should have allowed the trial court to confront its earlier version which should have been on record for the mere decision of the case, section 626262, CRPC and Article 4040 to The first time Conan's testimony, 1984, 1984, was related to the matter, was to instruct the trial court to provide a copy of the first version to the accused, which he had presented to the investigating officer and then recalled it. In order to bring this up, the applicant has to contend with his first version for the fair decision of the case according to which the review request was accepted. The
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Gujranwala lawyer