MUHAMMAD AZAM versus TARIQ TRANSPORT COMPANY LTD., HEAD OFFICE THE MALL, LAHORE
Form of the law relating to the jurisdiction of the court award by the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), sections 12 (2) and 6 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, section 14 (c), The value was Rs. The court ruled over 30,000 by a civil judge, objected to the petition filed under arbitration 12 (2), CPC and sections 20 and 33 under the Arbitration Act 1940, alleging that it was fraudulent and Was the result of a false statement. Civil Judge through Third Class whose specific limit is up to Rs. 25,000, because as a matter of value for the articles of reference, the award and order passed by the Civil Judge 1st Class was beyond the specified limit of the Civil Judge Third Party. The jurisdiction in this case lacks jurisdiction and they could not decide the petition because the expression court used in section 12 (2), the CPC had to be construed as the court having jurisdiction over the matter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
