Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

IMRAN SAEED versus THE STATE


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application In compliance with the order approved by the Development Commission of the National Industrial Relations Commission, in the priority application of the next level before the request of the National Industrial Relations Commission. Frustrated at not progressing. The permission was given by the commission and the employer was instructed to consider the case of the applicant which was approved by the commission which was applied to the Supreme Court. The employer made a statement before the commission that a case of publicity has been sent to the applicant's father. The application was filed by the employee / applicant under Section 22 (c) of the Finance Division for Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 on the basis that the FI was not found suitable by the Development Committee of the Department. The petitioner was of the view that the employer did not comply with the grant of the commissions, and under section 22 (c) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, the officers of the legal proceedings increased the post of the Public Promotion Committee, the national industrial The employer simply refused to perform his duties and obligations to comply with the order of the relationship. The Commissioner and the High Court, as well as those approved by the Supreme Court, after the unrepresented representation that the applicant's case was recommended to be promoted to the Finance Division under the Rules, the employer referred the matter to the Department of Publicity Committee. I couldn't deviate from the move. Such promotion of the next level of word / thought promotion is not the equivalent of ignoring the employee's legitimate and legitimate right to work,

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Tharo Shah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.