WARIS KHAN versus DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT CUSTOM, MARDAN
Section 16, 156 (1) (8) (89) (9) (90), 157 and 178 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 561A and 351 of the Customs Act, 1969 revoke the order of the trial court While prosecuting the accused, the accused had directed the prosecutor to re-investigate the case against the applicant, who according to the evidence at the trial was the main accused, the criminal code of conduct of 1898. Did not have the authority to order a re-investigation into the matter. Calling a lawsuit or someone who was present to record the evidence after the trial of the accused, in order to connect with the crime by appearing on record evidence, was sued after the trial. After the trial, the case was dropped after the trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Kashmore lawyer
