Plaintiffs' petition was presented by the plaintiff's record of the facts in which the Artists 70 and 71 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 42 and 54 of the suit and declaration of oral sale deal were dealt with in this case. Was shown. The property was jointly owned by the parties, heirs were confirmed, but at the time of the confirmation of the inheritance changes by the Revenue Officer, there was no question of sale by the plaintiff applicants in the suit. While in possession of the property but they were cultivating, the co-resident, Raghala Patwari, admitted that no consideration or sale of the tax was filed in favor of the plaintiff applicants in proving the applicant's oral sale. Failure, material evidence was taken into account for misreading and non-reading of evidence, no Reconsideration request has been deleted
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
