MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION RAWALPINDI
Sections 10 and 15 (2) of the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act 1976, the recruitment board of the Intermediate and Secondary Education jurisdiction to ban the recruitment under the influence of the provincial government, the provincial government issued a post and recruited the Education Department Banned Secondary Board Chairman's refusal to recruit candidates for copy of letter on the basis of the letter The High Court allowed a constitutional application and declared that the ban on recruitment was not applicable in the boards. The High Court allowed the appeal by the Division Bench The letter of the relevant Board to justify the ban on the board of the High Court judgment on the legal status of independent chairmen have the full authority to appoint or remove it from their employees' services. Of the letter, the same subject matter was t o be considered and not the details of the addresses to which the instructions issued by the provincial government were applicable only to the appointment of the provincial department as this letter was given to the heads of the board. Was gone, but it won't happen. Apply to employees of boards The provincial government did not issue a clear directive to issue boards of appointment which applies to employees of the Department of Education, cannot be extended to cover employees' case. ? The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court Education Boards in the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Daur lawyer