THE STATE versus ASIF ALI
Customs Act 1969 Section 164 (2) (a) / 89/156 (1) (8) / 80 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 561 Termination of legal proceedings by the High Court Could not resolve Section 6161 AA, there is no record of any evidence in the exercise of its power under CRPC, which was still being examined by the trial court when the recognized order passed under section 6161 AA. Was not intended to stop CRPC. The prosecution's case, but instead, was to provide litigation on the occasion of litigation in which the dispute could be resolved with the factual patent on the record, and both parties acknowledged that the case I could have a dispute. The determination of the facts admitted and if there was no offense to the facts presented on the record and was not disputed by the parties, the powers under section 6161A, CRPC, in this case It could have been used by the High Court, which approved the pro-decree ruling. Hurry and at a time when the parties were still required to prove the accuracy of their version, the subsequent order was put aside and the trial court received a remand on remand for the accused. To go to trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Mansehra lawyer