The contempt of court contemplated in Section 3/4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204, was explicitly included under Section 3 of the contempt of court Act, 1976. Two High Court judges began a criminal inquiry against the Chief Justice for retaliation for the contempt / slander they caused by failing to comply with their orders and instructions. What was Not only in his personal capacity as Chief Justice, but against the plaintiff and the accused (accused), he had clearly diminished the authority of the Court and in his regard to discredit the Chief Justice and the Judges. Was encouraged. In the disciplinary order for the Chief Justice and the two judges, the purpose of the illegal and dishonest purpose of launching an inquiry against the accused can certainly diminish the public's confidence in the credibility of the judicial system, which the aforementioned judges have requested. Averment was to be administered and the right to be raised was not made in the circumstances nor was it considered by the authorities under section 3 (vi) and (vii) the contempt of court Act, 1976 in the High Court. Was submitted in which the Chief Justice was presented as the respondent No.1 and was not presented to the Chief Justice of the High Court or the Chief Justice. Pakistan did not initiate contempt of court proceedings against the accused in reference made by the competent authority to initiate proceedings against him in any reference against the Chief Justice or other judges, but on the basis of the above People were started. To plead guilty to the accused on a petition filed by him in the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
