Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus THE STATE

Sections 2, 2, 8 308 and ? evidence App (a) Changes in the conviction of witnesses to the value of evidence before the accused confessed to his guilt were independent witnesses in the area with no purpose to be found false. Yes, the version of the prosecution was supported by medical evidence, the recovery reported by the Chemical Examiner and the presence of evidence about the suspect in and around the suspect at strange times of the night. The cases also reinforced the prosecution's case; there was no enmity against any of the prosecution's witnesses, including the complainant. The defendants' conviction for wrongful involvement in the case and the conviction of the original offender was upheld, however, being under the age of 18 at the time of the incident, in terms of section 299 " Adult "was not (a), PPC, his case came under the S888, PPC, and he gained sufficient maturity to understand the truth. According to the facts and circumstances of the case, the conviction was sentenced to death by the trial court on the basis of the facts and circumstances of the case, which was imposed on him by the trial court. Had to pay best advocate from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer